<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ArgKit: An argumentation toolkit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/</link>
	<description>some personal argumentation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: brooks</title>
		<link>http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Just thought I would pass on the link to Debatepedia, if you haven&#039;t heard of this project before. It&#039;s &quot;the Wikipedia of pros and cons&quot;, essentially, and can help with your argumentation theory ideas, I think. Have a look:

http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia!

Best,

Brooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I would pass on the link to Debatepedia, if you haven&#8217;t heard of this project before. It&#8217;s &#8220;the Wikipedia of pros and cons&#8221;, essentially, and can help with your argumentation theory ideas, I think. Have a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia</a>!</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Brooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bowerman</title>
		<link>http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bowerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I was the one who added Dung to the argumentation entry 
on Wikipedia!  Have you talked to the Cancer Research ACL guys working on argumentation?  Congrats on doing your library.  Argumentation is applicable anywhere professional debate occurs, which is in so many professions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was the one who added Dung to the argumentation entry<br />
on Wikipedia!  Have you talked to the Cancer Research ACL guys working on argumentation?  Congrats on doing your library.  Argumentation is applicable anywhere professional debate occurs, which is in so many professions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://halfdecent.net/2008/01/24/argkit-an-argumentation-toolkit/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I made some updates to this entry... added a screencap and tidied up the prose.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made some updates to this entry&#8230; added a screencap and tidied up the prose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
